A starting point for discussion
The idea
The author considers ways to keep people involved in decisions made with algorithms. The approaches range from human review to the more unusual possibility of combining humans and machines. He says each may fall short alone, though combinations might be enough.
What this means and why it matters
What this means
The author groups several possible responses under the aim of keeping people in the decision-making process while using algorithms. The approaches range from human review to human-machine integration, which the passage introduces but does not detail here.
Why it matters
This frames the discussion around whether people can remain involved while retaining possible benefits from automated systems. The passage does not establish that any approach or combination will succeed.
Conditions & assumptions
Source coverage: Full readable text of the author manuscript from an accessible mirror; not the publisher typeset version. Passage 26 introduces accommodation approaches, describes their range, and says they may not work alone but could suffice in combination.
Claims behind this perspective
Open a claim to examine its reasoning, evidence and objections. A claim can support more than one perspective.