A starting point for discussion
The idea
Danaher says neither resisting the threat nor finding a satisfactory way to live with or manage it is likely to succeed without risking other things people value about social decision-making. He separately describes resistance as morally undesirable and says that finding a satisfactory way to live with or manage the threat would be difficult.
Place in the reasoning
AI assessment · Connected to reasoning
The author assesses both resistance and accommodation as risky or difficult, and the supplied passages do not fully specify the reasoning or risks.
Adapting to computer systems or resisting them can both carry risks
States the narrative’s central trade-off while preserving that these are the author’s assessments, not tested intervention findings.
What this means and why it matters
What this means
The author expects resistance and finding a satisfactory way to live with or manage the threat to face different problems. The author also warns that either response may risk other valued features of social decision-making.
Why it matters
The article presents a difficult choice rather than a simple solution. The supplied text does not identify which features are at risk or explain the detailed case for each assessment.
Conditions & assumptions
Source coverage: Full readable text of the author manuscript from an accessible mirror; not the version formatted by the publisher. These are the author’s assessments of proposed responses, not findings from approaches that have been tested; the supplied passages do not specify the risks or give the full reasoning. Addresses: The author’s assessment of resistance and accommodation (finding a satisfactory way to live with or manage the threat)
Questions this connects to
AI-suggested relationships. Authors have not necessarily responded to one another.
How strong is this claim?
AI assessment · not a probability or a final resolution