Contribution to the handbook
Set aside · Assessed 2026-10-27
The wording seeks a single illustrative example from the source, without specifying a design implication or broader inquiry that would materially affect the handbook. The supplied packet does not provide the answer, so no claim about the example itself is made.
Does this challenge the goal?
None identified
The question asks for an example used in the paper; it does not challenge the exploration’s goal, assumptions, or desired deliverable.
The packet contains the question and related questions but no answer identifying the example.
Why this category?
- Narrow source-recall scope
- No specific design, risk, implementation, or test contribution is stated
- The evidence packet supplies no answer to the question
The missing answer is not evidence that the example is globally unavailable or irrelevant; the set-aside judgment rests on the question’s narrow wording and lack of a stated design connection.
This is an AI assessment of contribution to the goal, separate from whether the question has an answer.
- What example does the author give of political debate about hidden data practices?
- How does the author describe the amount and framing of discussion about opacity?
- What example does the author give of the hiddenness concern’s legal grounding?
- What two concerns does the author identify?
- What problem does the author see beyond hidden algorithm use?
- How could data-mining systems change the balance between citizens and decision-makers?
- What is the scope of the concerns discussed in this section?
- How does the author distinguish the reasons to worry about hiddenness and opacity?
- What problem does the author examine in public decisions?
- How does the author distinguish hiddenness from opacity?
- What legal example does the author give in discussing hidden data practices?
- Why might people find it difficult to resist the systems that collect data about them?
New evidence is being assessed. Any answer below is provisional; parts whose evidence changed or was withdrawn are withheld.
Identify the example of political debate the author gives.
What we can say so far
The supplied material does not identify a specific example of political debate about hidden data practices. It only says that public debate or regulation may help people learn about hidden uses; that does not name the example the author gives.
What remains open
- A source passage or summary naming the specific political debate is not supplied.
Conditions and limits
- The relevant answer summaries describe an interpretation of the readable author manuscript, not the publisher's typeset version.
- The mention of public debate or regulation is general and does not establish a particular example.
Evidence and related ideas
Supporting evidence, qualifications and context play different roles in this answer.
context
What example does the author give of the hiddenness concern’s legal grounding?Asks about a legal example but supplies no answer evidence.
The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation
Read full source: The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation (opens in a new tab) ↗Read source discussion: The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation →
context
Monitoring can be hard to notice Widespread data monitoring can make resistance difficult because people may rely on these technologies in daily life and become less aware of their uses and effects.
Mentions public debate or regulation as possible ways to learn about hidden uses, but names no specific political debate.
The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation
Read full source: The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation (opens in a new tab) ↗