A starting point for discussion
The idea
The proposed approach combines direct citizen participation with separate powers and independent checks. Different bodies could write, carry out, review, and limit rules. No one body should decide what the public wants, carry it out, and then be the only one to judge whether it was right.
What this means and why it matters
What this means
The proposal draws on public participation and checks among separate bodies, without claiming to copy a specific country’s system.
Why it matters
The bodies that interpret, carry out, and review a rule should not all be the same body. The proposal does not yet say how those roles would be assigned.
Conditions & assumptions
This adapts principles rather than choosing procedures or voting thresholds from another place. Specific arrangements remain unsettled.
Claims behind this perspective
Open a claim to examine its reasoning, evidence and objections. A claim can support more than one perspective.
Related claims & perspectives
AI-suggested relationships. Authors have not necessarily responded to one another.